← Back to Master File Filing 10 · All Filings
Duran / Anguiano Attorney Package · v3
Privileged · Counsel Eyes Only
Filing 10 · Confidential Attorney Work Product

Attorney Verification List

Duran / Anguiano v. Bail Bonds USA, LLC, Grant Christopher Ledger, and Bankers Insurance Company
Prepared April 30, 2026 · Updated May 13, 2026 (v3)
Drafting limitation. This filing is attorney work product. It is not legal advice and is not ready for filing without counsel verification. Facts are tagged as source-backed, OCR-pending, or counsel-verification-required where the record is incomplete or scanned.

Critical Verification Before Filing Or Demand

Verification Priority (re-ordered for v3)

PriorityItemReason
1Pull official Maricopa County docket for CR2018-101992-001 + CR2018-005797-002 + CR2016-145702-001Confirms no order mandates 18% interest (vs Ledger's 'court mandated' claim); confirms three Satisfactions of Judgment closed State's claim by 2/6/2020; pulls Carlos's recapture / conviction / sentencing dates.
2DIFI written confirmation that BBUSA / Ledger holds NO Premium Finance Company license under A.R.S. § 6-1402Single most load-bearing fact for the usury argument. Without this, the $197,596.22 interest disgorgement claim is weaker.
3Run full OCR on properties sold.pdf (50 pages, deferred in current build)Confirms both ALTA Settlement Statements; reconciles $6.36 escrow shortfall; locks property / parcel numbers for quiet-title pleading.
4Current title reports on all 5 collateral propertiesControls TRO / quiet title / wrongful lien posture; confirms whether Deeds of Release were ever recorded on the 2 sold parcels.
5Original audio files + professional transcript + chain-of-custody declarationMay 12 Daniel audit supplies exact 'court mandated interest' quote; for filing use, counsel needs authenticated transcript.
6Pull 2015 DIFI Consent Order Matter 15A-125-INS from DIFI public archiveEstablishes recidivism pattern; supports max DIFI penalty and Linthicum 'evil mind' punitive framework.
7Subpoena Aron / Aaron Bray's third-party invoices (or any agency document supporting the $35,000 skip-trace fee)Without contemporaneous receipts, the fee falls under A.A.C. R20-6-601(E)(2)(c) and DIFI Bulletin 2012-03 - reduces base for interest compounding by $35K.
8Subpoena agency bank statements Feb-Aug 2019Traces the $33,700 in underposted payments; supports breach + accounting fraud claims.
9Subpoena agency deposit record 1/18-20/2022Traces the $6.36 escrow shortfall ($204,751.71 ALTA wire vs $204,745.35 agency receipt).
10Subpoena credit-card record + signature for receipt 14279510 (3/1/2026)Carlos is in prison; this 'Carlos paid' receipt is anomalous and possibly falsified.
11Detective Moore (Phoenix PD) declaration re: family cooperation in Carlos's recaptureRebuts Ledger's 'family refused to help' framing; tied to good-faith / retaliation analysis.
12Visual verification of May 2026 Invoice #119 and Bond ContractOCR already confirms Invoice #119 ($387,983.80), Bond Date 11/30/2018, Premium Fee $52,000, and Bond Contract Clause NINTH 18% per annum / $35 late fee p. 6 / 25% skip-trace fee p. 4. Attorney should still eyeball the original pages before any filing.

Open Reconciliations (carried forward from MASTER v3)

FieldConflicting values across sourcesResolution path
Bond date11/30/2018 (Invoice #119 OCR + breakdown OCR) vs 12/1/2018 (Collateral Deposit Receipt) vs 12/3/2018 (agency receipts + family letters)Pull court docket entry; bond posting date is in CR2018-101992-001
Premium amount$50,180 (contract Fee Summary + CDR + Master File) vs $25,000 (Master Invoice #4814547 line item) vs $52,000 (Invoice #119 OCR p. 2 + breakdown OCR p. 2)Three different agency-issued figures; the $25,000 line is evidence of the 'two bonds' fabrication; counsel to confront in deposition
Indemnitor home address13556 (demand-letter letterhead - typo) vs 23356 (demand-letter narrative + .letter2.txt narrative) vs 23556 (May Invoice + DIFI Complaint + Settlement Letter + Strategy)Pull title record for the residence; correct service address before re-serving any demand
Buckeye ZIP85326 (Invoice #119 + Strategy CASE SUMMARY) vs 85396 (DIFI Complaint + Settlement Letter)Verify against title record / USPS
Demand letter dateApril 28, 2026 (per the letter's own letterhead) vs April 29, 2026 (Settlement Letter + Daniel's notes both miscite)The letter itself controls: April 28, 2026
Property sale proceeds to BBUSA$204,751.71 (ALTA) vs $204,751.73 (Martha's letters) vs $204,745.35 (Agency receipt 10094034) - $6.36 shortfall plus $0.02 driftSubpoena agency deposit record 1/18-20/2022 to trace the $6.36
Contract late fee$35 (Bond Contract OCR p. 6 + Strategy/Reconciled Ledger + CASE SUMMARY) vs $5 (Daniel May 10 'Ai Breach of Contract options' + 'Court cases')OCR controls at $35; Daniel's notes appear to misread Clause NINTH; counsel to confirm on the contract page
Total paid by Martha$328,651.73 (her demand letter) / $322,645.35 (Martha-heavy ledger) / $306,845.35 (combined ledger - most defensible) / $302,045.35 (agency Master Invoice 'Paid' field) / $288,945.35 (agency receipts only)Subpoena agency bank records; the $5,806 spread between Martha letter and combined ledger may be additional pre-2/19/2019 receipts not in handwritten ledger
Dec 27, 2021 payoff figure$261,300 (TOTAL PAYOFF) vs $261,200 (PRINCIPAL BALANCE)Two fields on the same letter (random.pdf p. 8); both numbers are correct in context
DIFI 2015 Consent Order numberMatter No. 15A-125-INS, Oct 7, 2015 (Strategy materials) vs Matter 12A-030-INS (older draft) vs Matter 12A-140-INS (separate DIFI matter cited as precedent)15A-125-INS is the correct one; pull from DIFI public archive before citing
Recovery agent name spellingAron Bray (Misconduct Investigation pdf) vs Aaron Bray (Strategy/Reconciled Ledger; Strategy/CASE SUMMARY)Confirm on contract page or agency records
← Back to Master File All Filings